To date, no formal response or notice of appearance has been filed with the Court. A copy of Plaintiffs’ counsel’s reply to Defendant Number 18 is on file with the Court. Plaintiffs’ counsel thus replied to the telephone message via e-mail to the Defendant, and advised them of the Aphearing date and the requirement to submit a formal response. Plaintiffs’ counsel received a telephonic inquiry from Defendant (Defendant Number 18) but this Defendant declined to leave a phone number to return the call. The Defendants have not responded to the Application for Preliminary Injunction, nor made any filings in this case, nor have the Defendants appeared in this matter either individually or through counsel.1 Because the Plaintiffs have satisfied the requirements for the issuance of a preliminary injunction, the Court grants the Plaintiffs’ Application for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. The Court convened a hearing on March 28, 2017, at which only counsel for Plaintiffs was present and available to present evidence supporting the Application for Preliminary Injunction. The Court has carefully reviewed the Motion and the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

§ 1651(a) and (d) and the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. The Plaintiffs have moved for entry of a preliminary injunction against the Defendants, who are identified on Schedule A, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 21), and upon the Preliminary Injunction Hearing held on March 28, 2017. 6), Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Brief to Add Domain Name to Plaintiffs’ Application for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 17-60650-CIV-SCOLA Order Granting Application for Preliminary Injunction This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Application for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No.

25 United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ABS-CBN Corporation and others, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.

Cinesilip teleserye